Claude 3.5 SonnetvsGPT-4o
Anthropic
🏆 Overall WinnerClaude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic's most intelligent model
Arena ELO
1298
Context
200K
Speed
85 t/s
Input/1M
$3
OpenAI
GPT-4o
OpenAI's flagship multimodal model
Arena ELO
1314
Context
128K
Speed
110 t/s
Input/1M
$2.5
Capability Radar
Category performance across 6 domains
Benchmark Scores
MMLU · HumanEval · MATH · GSM8K · GPQA · BBH
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Pros
✓Best coding (SWE-bench leader)
✓200K context window
✓Exceptional instruction following
Cons
✗Slower than GPT-4o
✗No native audio capabilities
GPT-4o
Pros
✓Best-in-class multimodal capabilities
✓Fastest major frontier model
✓Extensive third-party integrations
Cons
✗Higher cost than alternatives
✗Context window smaller than Gemini 1.5 Pro
🏆 Our Verdict
Based on overall benchmark averages, Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge with an average score of 84.6% across all benchmarks. However, the best choice depends on your use case — Claude 3.5 Sonnet excels in best coding (swe-bench leader), while GPT-4o stands out for best-in-class multimodal capabilities.